Recently, on Bill Simmons' BS Report
podcast, former Red Sox player Kevin Millar aired his belief that the
MVP award should go to an everyday player. Millar's thinking was that
pitchers already have the Cy Young Award, which should be enough.
In reality though, the award should go
to the best player, the player most valuable to his team. As we
head towards the playoffs, there is almost no doubt that the AL MVP
is Justin Verlander.
The last starting pitcher to win the AL
MVP award was Roger Clemens in 1986. While he had a phenomenal season
for the BoSox that year, Verlander's numbers in 2011 are better–
almost across the board. Verlander's ERA (2.29), WHIP (0.91), K/9
(9.0), total Ks (244) and K/BB (4.36) all surpass Rocket's MVP-season
numbers. Clemens had 24 wins that year. Verlander has 24 this year,
with a couple starts remaining.
Roger Clemens was the last starting pitcher to win the MVP, in 1986 |
This in itself isn't enough to
give him the award. Comparison across eras isn't what MVP awards are
given out for. These numbers do help Verlander's case, though, when
they are added to the fact that he has been invaluable for the AL
Central-winning Tigers.
An MVP should directly correlate with
wins, right? Well, the Tigers have won Verlander's last 12
starts. He is also 16-3 in starts that follow a Tigers' loss. This is in stark contrast to some of his competitors for the MVP award who are either on teams
who won't be in the playoffs (Toronto's Jose Bautista), or on teams in the midst of a
free-fall (Boston's Jacoby Ellsbury and Adrian Gonzalez). Verlander
is a workhorse, who logs big innings, and is directly responsible for
his team's wins.
For those who believe that a starting
pitcher, who plays once every five games, shouldn't garner MVP
consideration, here's a stat. Verlander faces somewhere around 28
batters per start (28.45 as of September 8). Meanwhile, Curtis
Granderson—another player up for the MVP—averages somewhere near
4 plate appearances per game (4.46 as of Sept. 8). If you take
Verlander's batters-faced and stretch those over 5 Tigers games, it
comes out to over 5. In this way, you could argue some starting
pitchers—the front-line workhorses—affect their teams more
directly than everyday hitters.
Verlander is the type of pitcher managers love. Jim Leyland of the Tigers doesn't have to worry about any of Verlander's starts, and knows that the bullpen will likely not get overworked in his games. While Granderson, Ellsbury, Gonzalez and Bautista have all gone through their respective slumps this year, Verlander has stayed consistently effective. This, again, differentiates him from fellow MVP candidates.
Verlander threw his second career no-hitter May 7, 2011 |
The season isn't over. Maybe Granderson
or Ellsbury go on a tear, and the Yanks or Sox make a strong
late-season push. Maybe Verlander gets rocked over his last couple
starts. But as it stands now, Verlander is having a special season.
He is the first AL pitcher to have at least 24 wins and 240
strikeouts since 1978. He threw his second-career no hitter. And he
has an incalculable value to the Tigers.
This type of season deserves an MVP,
not just a Cy Young.
No comments:
Post a Comment